Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

Bill of Rights - Whose Rights?

Wednesday, September 5th, 2007

A proposed Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web was posted this morning by Joseph Smarr on Open Social Web.

Joseph’s preamble states that it isn’t carved in stone (the phrase is chiseled in granite), but is intended to spur conversation and debate.

Do I have anything to contribute? On first reading, I’d say that the form and language tiptoe around rights which have already been abrogated by default, but at this moment I still have smoke coming out of my ears. This ‘document’ floored me.

Users, I presume, means all the constituents using the internet and web services? Or is this just for white American entrepreneurial tech insiders?

Why has this document been authored by four men? Four of the 10 men authoring the blog on which it’s posted?

You couldn’t find any women interested enough to participate? Any women prominent enough to consider inviting? Any women interested in the subject of their rights? Are there any powerful American female tech insiders? I’m a Canadian woman and I’m looking for them. I am also a ‘user’.

Women happen to be half of your constituents. Just like men, we aren’t all American. We aren’t all techies. We care about our rights.

—–
later…
Phil Wolff on Skype Journal says,
BORUS is a shallow attempt to codify broader, deeper rights in cyberspace. It’s like petitioning for the right to print an afternoon edition of the local newspaper on paper instead of fighting for Freedom of Speech with heart, guns, money and blood.”

Asinine Promotions or When Marketing Becomes A Con

Wednesday, November 15th, 2006

It’s been a while since I posted a personal rant, so here goes.

Bookstores are one of my weaknesses. Yesterday, I visited the World’s Biggest Bookstore downtown. In need of computer books, my wily subconscious delivered me first to a different department, where, of course, I found more books I hadn’t known I needed. As I looked up to orient myself and head to the computer section, a nice young man offered me a discount flyer, telling me that if I spent more than $50 I would receive a free $10 purchase coupon. Yes, it was in addition to the regular discount that I have a card for. Special 2 day only promotion. Since getting out of a bookstore for less than $50 is nigh impossible for me anyway, I accepted delightedly.

After collecting my other books, I arrived at the front cash registers. The clerk gave me a total which did not seem to reflect the $10 off so I asked for an explanation. Well. I shortly had 2 clerks involved, with a third looking on. The promotion was a few hours old, and they’d already put together sample receipts and other tools for trying to explain it to customers.

The $10 was deducted in prorated portions from the cost of each book as a percentage of the total. The unnecessarily complicated math seemed a red herring at that point, considering that after the various amount totaling $10 were deducted, there next appeared a charge of $10 for the purchase coupon itself. Ok, I asked, so where is the gift or discount?

The clerks, I am assuming, had also been coached not to give me a straight answer to this one. After listening to some meaningless mumbles and obfuscations, I spied a hint. Asking directly, I received a confirmation that after completing my purchase I would be given the gift, and that this would, apparently, induce me to return to the bookstore (in this same 2 day period) in order to use it. At no time did they suggest that I could split my books into 2 purchases in order to use it immediately, although this was done once I insisted on it.

Later, mentioned in a negligible manner, they threw in the information that if I wished to return or exchange any of the books, I would also be required to pay back the portion of the gift associated with it. That referred to the books in the primary purchase, where I had paid back the deducted $10, and also explained the complicated math. I don’t remember the last time I returned a book, but the idea that I would ‘pay them back’ for a deduction that I’d paid for (shown on the receipt) took the whole fabrication to yet another level of stupidity.

This is not promotion. This is a con. I’d expect it from a street vendor perhaps, but not in a large store.

Let’s not forget the introduction of the ‘promotion’ was a straightforward offer of $10 off a purchase of over $50, clearly designed to induce a customer who’d planned to drop $30 to double their spend. The manipulative trickery of this convoluted exercise was the most off-putting retail experience I’ve had in a while.

Uninformed and unhelpful sales clerks are so common now as to seem normal, but this sort of business practice in retail is more than a snubbing of customers. It is an insult. The marketing person who dreamed this up should be very relieved he did not get to meet me. Had I the time and strength yesterday, I’d have tracked down the store owner and not let up until the promotion was pulled. Yes, I do such things. As it was, I doubt that anyone took the trouble to note my views or convey them further.

Many of us often don’t have enough time to argue. The changing retail landscape makes it harder to walk out and go elsewhere. Are these things encouraging more such behavior? There may be some instances I can think of where I might not be able to find the same books elsewhere and only if I need them immediately, but that store definitely lost most or all of my business yesterday.

Another Why Does Technorati Do This?

Monday, October 16th, 2006

One more why Technorati? to add to the many. There’s the usual ‘why do updates take weeks’ and ‘why does emailing help’ typically get a response that says try us again in a week. A few weeks ago I actually got a response from help via email telling me that their embed code was buggy (not that this helped much).

My current why is about the my favorites functionality.

Of the 24 favorites I have listed in Technorati, 5 are supposedly non-existent, including a Gartner blog.

When I click on the top url I get the following message page:

HUH?
There are blogs, and then there’s whatever you just typed in. If it’s a blog, we don’t know about it. Maybe you made a typo. Or maybe it’s a blog that doesn’t exist. Maybe you don’t exist. (In which case, please ignore this.)”

Now when I click on the secondary url in the listing it works perfectly well, and I can also access these through a bookmark or feedreader. This apparently applies to anyone’s favorites that have no Technorati links to them, including one of Robert Scoble’s 11 favorites (a Microsoft url).

So what is the point of the slightly insulting message?

I regularly forget to go to my Blog rather than Post tab and click on that second url. Some of my favorite feeds are in my Technorati favorites, but by no means all. Only a feedreader recognizes all my favorites.

Human Encounter at Bell. It Can Happen.

Friday, September 15th, 2006

I hadn’t intended to continue my rant about Maw Bell, but fair’s fair and there’s a positive experience to share with my fellow optimists.

No phone service yesterday …hours on a cellphone… 8 calls to be exact.
5 of those ended in disconnection after up to an hour on hold and the 3 humans we spoke to were of the “My job sucks and you suck and my goal is to get rid of you as fast as possible.” variety. The one that agreed to get a supervisor had us waiting for hours for a call that never came.

Today, however, I had the miraculous luck of reaching a delightful human being. This didn’t happen through the regular repair and service channels, and his department doesn’t do anything specifically related to our repair needs. Nevertheless, this young man had the lines back up temporarily and techs here replacing faulty equipment within a few hours. He was polite. Kind. Friendly. I won’t reveal his name or location, but called back to thank him and wanted to acknowledge his existence here in light of my rants. His company may still be an inefficient monopoly, but I’m betting they don’t change him.

I’m not naïve enough to think that the customers repair and support people deal with are all delightful, polite and kind. No doubt some percentage (pick your own) are jerks and/or morons. This is not a justification for the same behavior on the part of anyone who has chosen to work in customer service.

Awesome service from Bell after this 11 month saga? I’m still pinching myself happily. :)

It’s Still People That DO Things

Sunday, September 10th, 2006

Friday afternoon saw trucks and workmen from Bell filling the pit and laying the sod. Despite their previous statement that the sod wouldn’t/couldn’t be laid for 2 weeks after the filling, they finished it all at once.

No, I don’t think someone read my little rant.

A neighbor happens to have a son who is a Bell supervisor in the right division.
He picked up his phone and …voila… job(s) completed and 11 month saga ends.

Sure, technology is grand, but ‘Emily’ or any avatar doesn’t replace humans. It is still people that get things done, and it gets more difficult to make contact with them every day.

…and to meander over into related musings…

I’m finally reading the Tipping Point, and was earlier reading a post by Steve Rubel on RSS.

This linked in to my mulling over the ‘disconnects’ we’ve inadvertently created with technology, in the context of The Law of the Few (connectors, mavens, and salesmen). Being a connector requires knowing other Doers and being recognized as one by them. They’re not recognized or connected with in any new way on the web. Mavens are getting the best of it so far if they can use the web effectively, and salesman, who use any and every media available, have an extra message delivery system in their arsenal.

In the expanded or narrowed environs of a tech powered world, it’s still humans creating parallel networks via electronic means. So whatever your profession or specialty, you can now network with an awesome number of your own kind the world over.

It is fascinating and wonderful to see the increase in territory being built by serious and reasonable individuals on the web.

Electronically generated and maintained relationships, though, barely replace RL ones much more effectively than Emily (your automated phone attendant). The real ‘connects’ and ensuing results are still accomplished the way they always have been. By humans.

Technology’s rapid integration into our day to day lives can be a bonus, as well as occasionally a disproportionate generator of frustration and waste. The basic ways in which people interact haven’t changed, but our day to day access to one another on every level is changing. My parents, and many of my peers, don’t even notice, and most of our adult (non-geek) children use computers simply, as a tool and toy.

My musing today is whether the rapidly increasing disconnects will alter our behavior and relationships in more significant ways.