Archive for September, 2006

The Best Logo Ever

Friday, September 29th, 2006

Some years ago, a friend told me this story. She was married at the time to a graphic designer who specialized in corporate logos.

During a visit to Montreal, she noticed her young daughter gazing spellbound through their hotel room window at the cross on the mountain, lit and blazing for the night. Her daughter asked her what it was.

After a moment’s reflection, my friend answered, first asking her daughter the question, “do you know what Daddy does?”. When her daughter nodded assent, Mom answered the original question by saying, “That is the best logo ever designed.”.

Design: The Meanings Of This Word

Friday, September 29th, 2006

Is there any other word that has come to mean so much and so little?

For speakers of a language as rich in synonyms and idiom as English, I find it remarkable the extent to which we are discussing the definition of this single word.

A difficult enough word for its broad range of original meanings, the poor thing has become so overburdened, not least in our use of it as a noun, as to begin blurring into meaninglessness.

The words “I am a designer” basically translate to “I plan the creation of things”. When did we lose the end of that sentence? Say instead, “I am a planner” or “I am a creator” and the left-hanging listener will ask, “…of what?”. Of airplanes or fashion or toilets or architectural interiors?

“I am a designer” is now often synonymous with “I am creative” or “…a creative”, another verb we’ve turned into a noun in an equivalent usage by publishing, marketing, and other business folks. This new terminology makes me wish fervently for a renaissance of elementary classification.

Even more confusing is the mixing of the meaning of great design on one side with art or aesthetic beauty and on the other with streamlined and exceptional performance.

In terms of cultural history, design as we recently perceived it, was the errant and undisciplined child of art and architecture. Once regarded as primarily in the frivolous province of feminine creatures, and strictly confined to the lesser realms of fashion, craft and industry, it perversely found its path to freedom via the development of modern art and architecture through the 20th century.

In terms of science and technology, economic growth has fueled increased use of the design label in everything from mechanics to application of theories.

Architecture, like science, remains firmly tied to an essential underpinning of academic knowledge, whereas art and design have successfully flown that coop, losing many strict definitions along the way, belonging with equal pride to the conventionally erudite and the autodidactic.

Those who pay the dues of acquiring academic knowledge delineate strictly between technical knowledge and raw talent. Their natural elitism is often couched in arrogance and intolerant of invention, yet remains based on sound values. Imo, the politically correct trends toward unconditional tolerance in modern academia might be better replaced with the equivalent of ‘tough love’.

We are constantly developing new design disciplines. The craftsmen who made traditional furniture and silver for our ancestors’ traditional homes up to the 19th century, gradually ceded their position to architectural and arts and crafts movements and industrial design. The force of this shift produced stunning decorative art and artifacts at its height, but more recently the applied scope of mass production, among other things, has returned much of the meaning and value of craft to individual hands.

In the 70s/80s, I developed a personal expectation that the technological revolution would propel a new creative pendulum, unleash a new creative force, in much the same way as the industrial revolution did. My basic expectation has not faltered, but I’m finding the effort of adapting our creative terminology to the new creations of virtual reality extremely difficult.

Do we need more words?
New words?

What means of identifying and communicating concepts do we have that exceed the power of language?

How many classifications and sub classifications of designer could we delineate in just the new category of technology represented by computers?

Web Entrepreneurship One

Friday, September 29th, 2006

The Architect, The Engineer and The Money Guy

This is the most basic starting team for new web and web related products. The first 2 guys, call them the developer and the coder (although each is likely some of both), can sometimes get it going alone in the basement and take it as far as possible on a shoestring. The further they can get before they need to pitch the money guy(s), the better they’re likely to do.

The product idea that most developers strive to come up with, usually an application, a bridge, or a newer better version of a hot destination trend, is typically related to their own interests and experiences.

It’s devoted gamers often developing the games they dream about, and music junkies who think up more-faster-better ways to get their fix.

This formula works, because whatever you love and know well is where you’re going to have the best ideas, most experience, highest motivation, and connection to the market.
The architect/developer is the constituent. Whatever you’re into, pick your genre(s) and create the product or service that you’d love to see and that no one else has yet.

The next most common entrepreneurial process I’m seeing is choosing a mass market product or service, again one that you know a lot about and use regularly, and creating a better portal or venue for it. You’re a car geek? Build a car parts exchange site, an international rental network, a specialty auction house.

This is the kind of individual entrepreneurship that our modern economies have been built on.

The Superstars

What distinguishes the superstar architects, such as Page of Google or Wales and Sanger of Wikipedia? Their focus is on the web landscape is broad, encompassing huge constituencies. They have vision beyond the personal sphere.

The same broad focus applies to successful money men, such as Diller of IAC, who has followed a path from the box to the web via a pattern of entertainment related acquisitions, and is well into the interactivity of the medium, given holdings such as uDate.

The superstar architect and businessman landscape is also wide open for development.

There are hundreds of millions of constituents whose presence on the web is quite limited. Weekly banking, a bit of research and reading, maybe a brief visit to eBay or LLBean, and the occasional bookings through Tickemaster and Expedia, pretty much cover all they’ve found to suit so far. These are not the teens on MySpace and YouTube whose valuable eyeballs represent a small segment of the population, and they aren’t particularly tech savvy. They really believe that there isn’t much here yet. They have tremendous spending power.

What will be developed for them next?

I think that building something for everyone is very different from building something that is targeted to you and your personal peers and networks.
I also believe there are lots of places in the sun for both.

How Do We Cope With Terrorists in Canada

Tuesday, September 26th, 2006

I removed yesterday’s links post after learning that the Canadian gaming site led to terrorist links.

People do need to get on with living their lives, and cannot do so when paralyzed by mortal terror. I get this. However, the extent to which people in this country avoid taking any personal responsibility for their communities is truly a sin of omission.

Are we so invested in our civilized culture, that we would sooner turn a blind eye to any activity that threatens to stain our polite veneer than safeguard what is ours? One doesn’t have to look hard, or do much more than open the eyes, to find information on the reality of terrorist activity here. Start with articles such as this one on the Mackenzie Institute site. If you’re looking for yourself, then please don’t stop there, but continue seeking information independently. I am not an expert or a journalist and my writings here are my personal opinions based on my own experiences and readings.

I years ago lost track of the number of Americans who, upon learning that I was from Toronto, responded with some form of, “Toronto is a beautiful city …it’s so clean.”. More and more the word clean, in this context, is coming to mean sanitized and antiseptic to me, but only, dangerously, on the surface. We sweep all ugliness and unpleasantness under the rug in order to maintain our pristine self image, and in doing so put our children’s future at peril.

The thing we’ve always touted with pride in this city, our tolerance and multiculturism, is becoming a fragile and uncertain thing as the world changes. I’m shocked to hear educated intelligent fellow citizens tell me that each ethnic community within our culture is responsible for cleansing its own.

Certainly no private individual can take responsibility for and action in segments of our society outside of their personal sphere. We each can, and should, though, take full responsibility within it, and communal responsibility throughout.

If this marvelous ‘melting pot’, as Torontonians proudly term this city, truly exists, then our spheres of personal influence overlap across demarcations of ethnic origins. Personal spheres of influence include ones family, friends, and co-workers, as well as community business and property owners. Who among us cannot count multiple ethnic origins among the denizens of those personal spheres?

Yes, it’s a heck of a lot harder to pay attention and comprehend the presence of dangerous influences in the lives of our children and everyone else we care about than it used to be. The sheer volume of contact enabled by this new world of technology we live in can be mind numbing on a personal level, and we’re often focused on learning to tune most of it out so we can get something done. Doing the exact opposite, opening our reception to the entire cacophony bombarding everyone around us, is simply impossible. Retreating ever further on a personal level, though, is an abdication of responsibility which equates directly with the rights and freedoms we’ve come to take for granted.

For too many people the only coping strategy for this is to turn increasingly to the comforting illusion that our law enforcement, our governments, our Big Brother, will take care of things. Those people we pay and elect to ‘take care’ of everything for us, though, are usually underpaid, sometimes corrupt, and often fallible human beings just like we are. We share responsibility for their actions no less than we do for our own or those of our families, employees, etc.

So how do we cope with the cacophony? The same way that we cope with the new media bombardment on a personal level. By creating and constantly fine tuning custom filters. The faster the world changes, the more flexible and adaptable we have to become. The single most frustrating aspect of exploding new technology and the changes in our world on a personal level is the fact that there’s no such thing as learning something new once and for all. Who hasn’t proudly mastered, at long last, a new idea or tool only to be rudely greeted with the fact that it’s outdated, requiring us to update our skills against encroaching obsolescence? That’s a pretty rough treadmill for most people. Who personally has the time and ability to fully observe and analyze even a fraction of the entire cacophony?

The result of this is that just as we’re all being drawn into the overwhelming global pool of humanity through technological connections and advances, many normal, well meaning people are instinctively retreating to safety. The ‘pooling’ of humanity, the breaking down of the barriers that separate us, is, perversely, also highlighting our differences and conflicts.

I believe this is actually a good thing. The time of change we’re living through isn’t easy, but change never is. Growing up has always been hard. Every challenge, though, every painful transition, is exaggerated by denial and eased by willed acceptance.

The world will continue to get smaller. We and our children will continue to become more and more vulnerable …until we decide to face that reality. The same new elements of our existence that expose us to danger offer the means to safety and survival when we embrace cognizance and take up the responsibility for our rights and freedoms.

Focusing our political attention on red herrings such as overloud protest about racial profiling is no more productive than election time mud slinging, tactics which are used to cry wolf until they lose meaning. If you’re just a business person, or just a worker, who, like most of us, concentrates most of your energy on paying the bills, getting ahead, and remembering to celebrate your humanity at the same time, you still retain the choice of whether to be a witless pawn or a responsible citizen. In choosing the latter, you accept, as I do, that we all have a personal stake in creating the world we want to live in.

Sane human beings have a built in moral compass. Personal freedom, both an ancient and a modern concept, is a bounty of taking ownership of and being guided by that compass. When you choose to follow a leader whose words make you feel good and appeal to you personally without examining the underlying premises determining your course, you are handing over your freedom rather than joining it to a group or cause.

Would doing that make you a bad person? Evil? Well meaning but misguided? An innocent dupe? Are any of those descriptions a sufficient self-goad to take the time to learn, analyze, and make conscious choices rather than taking the path of least resistance? I believe that those of us who choose freedom and responsibility can act and strengthen our cause from within the parameters of our daily lives.

Canada today is not always an easy place in which to state such opinions, but there have not been many societies or many moments in human history where it was easy. Human freedom has typically been won through revolution, not argument. Forming, holding, and stating a strong opinion garners attention. It also has a wonderful way of identifying solid relationships and cementing them, when it is based on a foundation of honesty and respect.

We are a clean and polite society here. Simple politeness is as powerful a means of showing respect as it is a tool of hypocrisy. It is the latter use which is dangerous. The fact that those who decide to send our troops, our family members, to Iraq can only make doing so politically palatable by calling it peace keeping and making loud statements of policy decrying barbarous methods and practices, is totally representative of our sanitized self-image.

We’ve learned to be horrified by sexual predators (although we still let them out), and are no longer surprised to hear a neighbor telling a reporter how nice and normal the perp seemed. Why is it acceptable to note, for example, that crime rates are higher in poor neighborhoods, but not to identify which societies spawn higher or lesser numbers of predators? Can not such identification focus as equally and constructively on identifying desirable societal attributes? Where does our treasured multiculturalism, in which each ethnic group contributes and is proud of its best, disappear to? Most importantly now, are we prepared to reason clearly enough to address real threats of terrorism that make us more vulnerable in this shrinking world without being handicapped by our racial and other insecurities?

Coding As Another Metaphor For Life

Sunday, September 24th, 2006

Conflict Resolution.

That is at the heart of everything.
Scientific discovery. Brilliant code. Religious bliss. Love. Peace. Prosperity.

We begin with a dream, a goal, a destination.

We team with others who share the vision if we can.

We’re sometimes surrounded by people who get in the way, inadvertently creating obstacles for us, by people who like us and are supportive in a general or even loving way, yet simply either can’t or don’t get it …it being where we’re headed. We encounter others who deliberately get in the way.

We get there anyway.

It’s a bonus if you’ve managed not to run anyone over on the way, and if all your friends and loved ones are happy that you’re happy.

Getting there, to that dream or goal or destination, means resolving many conflicts, bringing everything into compliance, creating an oasis of harmony.

It’s far from easy, but words like righteous and awesome aren’t an overstatement of how it feels.

There is no drug known to man that can get you as high as the euphoria of making the perfect business deal, one where everyone wins, or building a successful community that makes your corner of the world a better place, and writing perfect code is as ideal a means of human accomplishment as any.

Not to leave out the quests for divine understanding or high art, angelic music or the love of one’s life, but these belong on a more singular and highly personal plane.

There is no human discipline which does not require resolution of conflict to produce outstanding achievements.

Coders, it seems to me, occupy a territory uniquely situated between science and humanities, a place without many barriers to progress, a place as pure as scientific theory or musical composition and as rich to mine as any frontier man has discovered. The best will gift us all with things as ubiquitous as kleenex or the telephone, and with images as powerful as our most beautiful buildings, our fastest cars, and our favorite heroes.